How do you figure out afghan sizes?
I have created a formula to calculate the chain counts needed to get to the sizes you need. The formula will also calculate stitch sets for those who require a pattern, such as a wave afghan to stay in balance for stitches.
Sizes of afghans have been provided in the equation for those interested to know the standard sizes of crochet afghans. I have included everything from receiving blanket sizes to king size.
For my calculator, you will need a measuring tape to give me a few dimensions. Due to everyone having their own gauge for stitching, this formula will adjust to your own tension to provide you with accurate details.
More Help Suggestions
- Calculator: Yarn Substitutions for Yardages
- Calculator: How Many Granny Squares Do You Need?
- Calculator: Granny Square Ball Colour Counts
- Yarn Substitution Calculator
- Figuring Out Pattern Repeat
- Calculator: Felt Shrinkage
Crochet Afghan Pattern Ideas
[the_grid name="Afghans"]
cgurl says
Ok, question. I read a pattern that was originally for knitters, but someone gives a general outline of how to do the same pattern for crochet. They said to chain enough to length to make 70 inches. Is there a calculation for that? As in how many sc in an inch? or how many sc in 70 inches?
Or do I just single crochet and keep measuring the length till I get to to 70 inches on a measuring tape? Kind of wondering if I am overthinking this!? Help!
joyce says
It depends on your stitch size. Make a sample swatch and measure
Krystalynn says
Thank you for this calculator. But I was wondering how it would help me with a baby star afghan. I found a star pattern video tutorial but it didn't list how many rows to do or how big it should be.
RB says
This is a great tool, thank you so much! On the section that calculates the length based on your row height, I'm finding an error when you try to enter a number with a decimal. For example, I'm trying to enter 2.25, but a yellow bubble pops up saying "Please enter only digits." Despite the error, it does appear that it's calculating correctly - still, it seems like something that should be fixed or clarified. Thanks again!